Resumen
Introduction. Prostatic hyperplasia is considered the most common benign tumor in man, causing a rapid evolution in medical and surgical treatment modalities; transurethral endoscopic approach is the goal standard in prostates smaller than 70 grams; above that weight, open surgery is preferred.. Our objective was to determine morbidity and mortality in postoperative patients with prostatic hyperplasia with a new technique of packaging and unpackaging in prostates greater than 70 grams.
Methods. A clinical trial was conducted in 16 patients scheduled for prostatectomy, which were divided into two groups: Group A (n = 7) with the packaging technique and Group B (n = 9) as a control group (without packaging). Post-operative bleeding, number of transfused globular packets, surgical time, concomitant diseases, hospital stay, complications and weight of the gland were measured. The statistical analysis was performed by means of the chi square test for the qualitative variables and the Student's T test.
Results. There was no statistical difference in the T test for the variables of surgical bleeding as well as hemoglobin before and after surgery. The average weight of the prostate in group I was 130.7 grams and in group II 117 grams; greater frequency of comorbid diseases in group 2 was found. There was no surgical mortality.
Conclusions. Transoperative bleeding was more favorable in the control group in terms of lower requirement of globular packages and minor surgical bleeding. No morbidity or postoperative mortality was recorded with the packaging technique. Comorbid diseases had no influence on results.
Keywords. Morbidity and mortality, prostatectomy
1. Los autores que publican en esta revista están de acuerdo con los siguientes términLos autores conservan los derechos de autor y garantizan a la revista el derecho de ser la primera publicación del trabajo al igual que licenciado bajo una Creative Commons Attribution License que permite a otros compartir el trabajo con un reconocimiento de la autoría del trabajo y la publicación inicial en esta revista.
2. Los autores pueden establecer por separado acuerdos adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión de la obra publicada en la revista (por ejemplo, situarlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro), con un reconocimiento de su publicación inicial en esta revista.
3. Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir sus trabajos electrónicamente (por ejemplo, en repositorios institucionales o en su propio sitio web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, ya que puede dar lugar a intercambios productivos, así como a una citación más temprana y mayor de los trabajos publicados (Véase The Effect of Open Access) (en inglés).
